The rate of babies being born is dropping the most in counties where home values are appreciating the fastest, according to a new Zillow® analysis out Wednesday. An extra 10 percentage-point rise in home values is associated with an extra 1.5 percentage-point drop in birth rates for 25-to-29 year old women.
The trend is most pronounced in pricey California markets, as well as in Austin, Texas, Brooklyn, N.Y. and Seattle. In Los Angeles County, the birth rate among women aged 25 to 29 fell 17% from 2010 to 2016, while home values rose 31%. Zillow found that 2,588 fewer babies were born to women in this age group in Los Angeles County in 2016 than would otherwise be expected given local home value growth, the greatest drop in births among all counties analyzed.
In San Diego County, the birth rate fell 19% while home values rose 34%, which is associated with 1,148 fewer babies than would be implied by the area’s home value growth alone. The birth rate in Travis County fell 22%, while home values rose 33% — this is associated with 585 fewer babies than expected.
At the onset of the Great Recession, the birth rate began falling, dropping from a high of 2.12 babies per woman in 2007, to 1.93 by 2010. It’s common for birth rates to tick up as the economy improves, but the birth rate continues to fall even as the economy has recovered, to just 1.82 by the end of 2016.
Raising a child is an expensive proposition, and many couples may be questioning whether now is the right time to have kids or may be choosing to move to more affordable communities before starting a family. Many young adults aim for financial stability before having children, but with rising housing costs, financial stability may be increasingly out of reach — a 20% down payment on the typical U.S. home requires more than $40,000. Home values across the U.S. are appreciating at their fastest pace in 12 years, and are projected to rise another 6.5% over the next year.
Counties with the Greatest Drop in Birth-Rate Relative to Home Value Growth from 2010-2016
| County | Main City | Fewer Babies After Accounting for Home Value Change | Change in Home Values | Drop in Birth Rate |
| Los Angeles County, CA | Los Angeles | -2,588 | 31% | -17% |
| San Diego County, CA | San Diego | -1,148 | 34% | -19% |
| Orange County, CA | Los Angeles | -774 | 28% | -16% |
| Cook County, IL | Chicago | -709 | -3% | -9% |
| Philadelphia County, PA | Philadelphia | -700 | -2% | -14% |
| Travis County, TX | Austin | -585 | 33% | -22% |
| Kings County, NY | Brooklyn | -569 | 36% | -15% |
| Alameda County, CA | Oakland | -569 | 60% | -24% |
| King County, WA | Seattle | -545 | 32% | -18% |
| Middlesex County, NJ | Edison | -531 | -7% | -21% |
“There are many highly personal reasons beyond housing costs why some couples may delay having children, or choose not to have them at all, and it’s important to remember that correlation does not necessarily mean causation,” said Zillow senior economist Aaron Terrazas. “The big question this research raises is whether millennials are simply delaying childbirth into their 30s, or are actually choosing to have fewer children – and so far, the data are mixed. Recently released preliminary data shows fertility rates among 30-something women fell in 2017 for the first time since 2010, an ominous sign, but then again, respondents to recent census surveys indicate they expect to eventually have just as many children as respondents in prior years. Ultimately, this data adds another layer to the argument that rising housing costs are contributing to meaningful delays in achieving a number of key life milestones, including getting married and buying a first home – two very important steps on the road to starting a family.”
The birth rate was up in counties where home value growth is weaker. In Pima County, home to Tucson, Ariz., home values have essentially remained unchanged since 2010, but the birth rate is up 5%, which accounts for 340 more babies than expected.
| County | Main City | Extra/Fewer Babies After Accounting for Home Value Change | Home Value Change, 2010 to 2016 | Fertility Change for 25- to 29-Year-Old Women, 2010 to 2016 |
| Harris County, TX | Houston | 1,207 | 19% | -2% |
| Wayne County, MI | Detroit | 554 | 30% | -2% |
| Los Angeles County, CA | Los Angeles | -2,588 | 31% | -17% |
| Middlesex County, NJ | Edison | -531 | -7% | -21% |
| Miami-Dade County, FL | Miami | 892 | 50% | -4% |
| Dallas County, TX | Dallas | 745 | 14% | -1% |
| Utah County, UT | Provo | 479 | 12% | 4% |
| San Diego County, CA | San Diego | -1,148 | 34% | -19% |
| Orange County, CA | Los Angeles | -774 | 28% | -16% |
| Franklin County, OH | Columbus | -282 | 9% | -11% |
| Ocean County, NJ | The Jersey Shore | 146 | -7% | 2% |
| Philadelphia County, PA | Philadelphia | -700 | -2% | -14% |
| Santa Clara County, CA | San Jose | -412 | 58% | -20% |
| Pima County, AZ | Tucson | 340 | 0% | 5% |
| Cook County, IL | Chicago | -709 | -3% | -9% |
| Alameda County, CA | Oakland | -569 | 60% | -24% |
| Clark County, NV | Las Vegas | 295 | 40% | -8% |
| New Castle County, DE | Wilmington | -338 | -7% | -19% |
| Travis County, TX | Austin | -585 | 33% | -22% |
| Douglas County, NE | Omaha | 219 | 9% | 2% |
| San Bernardino County, CA | San Bernardino | 536 | 49% | -8% |
| Tarrant County, TX | Fort Worth | 440 | 17% | -3% |
| East Baton Rouge Parish, LA | Baton Rouge | 228 | -3% | 9% |
| Palm Beach County, FL | Palm Beach | 312 | 37% | -4% |
| Genesee County, MI | Flint | 153 | 20% | 2% |
| DeKalb County, GA | Atlanta | 239 | 11% | 1% |
| Berks County, PA | Reading | 169 | -8% | 8% |
| Suffolk County, NY | Long Island | -531 | -2% | -17% |
| Multnomah County, OR | Portland | -215 | 37% | -19% |
| Davidson County, TN | Nashville | -80 | 31% | -12% |
| Dakota County, MN | Minneapolis | 82 | 12% | -2% |
| Baltimore County, MD | Baltimore | -294 | -8% | -13% |
| Queens County, NY | Queens | 252 | 21% | -6% |
| Shelby County, TN | Memphis | 216 | 3% | 0% |
| Jefferson Parish, LA | New Orleans | 76 | -5% | 0% |